Convalescent Plasma for COVID-19: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial
C Avendaño-Solà, A Ramos-Martínez, E Muñez-Rubio, B Ruiz-Antorán, R Malo De Molina, F Torres, A Fernández-Cruz, A Callejas-Díaz, J Calderón, C Payares-Herrera, I Salcedo, I Romera, J Lora-Tamayo, M Mancheño-Losa, M L Paciello, C Villegas, V Estrada, I Saez-Serrano, M L Porras-Leal, M C Jarilla-Fernández, J R Paño-Pardo JR, J A Moreno-Chulilla, I Arrieta-Aldea, A Bosch, M Belhassen-Garcia, O López-Villar, A Ramos-Garrido, L Blanco, M E Madrigal-Sánchez, E Contreras, E Muñiz-Díaz, J M Domingo-Morera, I Casas-Flecha, M Pérez-Olmeda, Javier Garcia-Pérez, J Alcamí, J L Bueno, R F Duarte
doi:10.1101/2020.08.26.20182444
Background: Passive immunotherapy with convalescent plasma (CP) is a potential treatment for COVID-19 for which evidence from controlled clinical trials is lacking.
Methods: We conducted a multi-center, randomized clinical trial in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. All patients received standard of care treatment, including off-label use of marketed medicines, and were randomized 1:1 to receive one dose (250-300 mL) of CP from donors with IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in categories 5, 6 or 7 of the COVID-19 ordinal scale at day 15.
Results: The trial was stopped after first interim analysis due to the fall in recruitment related to pandemic control. With 81 patients randomized, there were no patients progressing to mechanical ventilation or death among the 38 patients assigned to receive plasma (0%) versus 6 out of 43 patients (14%) progressing in control arm. Mortality rates were 0% vs 9.3% at days 15 and 29 for the active and control groups, respectively. No significant differences were found in secondary endpoints. At inclusion, patients had a median time of 8 days (IQR, 6-9) of symptoms and 49,4% of them were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies.
Conclusions : Convalescent plasma could be superior to standard of care in avoiding progression to mechanical ventilation or death in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The strong dependence of results on a limited number of events in the control group prevents drawing firm conclusions about CP efficacy from this trial. (Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III; NCT04345523). .
References
Beigel, Tomashek, Dodd, Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19 -preliminary report, N Engl J Med,
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
Califf, Hernandez, Landray, Weighing the Benefits and Risks of Proliferating Observational Treatment Assessments.Observational Cacophony, Randomized Harmony, JAMA,
doi:10.1001/jama.2020.13319
Cao, Wang, Wen, A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19, New England Journal of Medicine
Cavalcanti, Zampieri, Rosa, Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin in Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19, New England Journal of Medicine
Chen, Xiong, Bao, Shi, Convalescent plasma as a potential therapy for COVID-19, Lancet Infect Dis
Gharbharan, Jordans, Geurtsvankessel, Convalescent Plasma for COVID-19. A randomized clinical trial, Medrxiv
Li, Zhang, Hu, Effect of convalescent plasma therapy on time to clinical improvement in patients with severe and life-threatening COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA. Published,
doi:10.1001/jama.2020.10044
Mair-Jenkins, Saavedra-Campos, Baillie, The effectiveness of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory infections of viral etiology: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis, J Infect Dis
Petkova, Antman, Troxel, Pooling Data From Individual Clinical Trials in the COVID-19 Era, JAMA Published Online,
doi:10.1001/jama.2020.13042